It's understandable in the simplest of terms

There was discussion about Griffin and Andrew Luck in 2012. and there was debate about Jameis Winston, or Marcus Mariota last year, however, this is different Mut 24 Coins. These were highly regarded prospects battling to be considered the top. This is a crop of good prospects, and no one knows which has the best potential to be successful.

The week before, Bill Barnwell of ESPN discussed how in the lottery-like draft "the smartest approach is to have greater numbers of tickets." The RG3 deal was possibly the best illustration of that ever, and the winners from the trade appear to be ignoring the principle. It could be that it works out, but the Rams should have a better idea.

The Chargers could sell Philip Rivers, but they'd likely make a mistake too.

LaDainian Tomlinson believes that the Chargers should trade Philip Rivers. The Chargers are in rebuilding mode, and should be able to trade Philip Rivers instead of ruin his entire career. Does that sound like a realistic option?

It's understandable in the simplest of terms. The Chargers are, once again an absolute disaster losing three games in excruciating way after blowing leads in the fourth quarter. Rivers doesn't contribute to the problem. He's getting 68.8% of the passes he throws, 7.8 yards per attempt and has 1.110 yards Madden 24 Coins Cheap. He also scored seven touchdowns and only one interception.

I think the issue of whether or not the Chargers should trade Philip Rivers slope online is a complicated one. Although Rivers still has good individual records, the Chargers are in the process of rebuilding and need to focus on developing the future. In some cases, trading an experienced player like Rivers can provide long-term benefits by gathering additional resources and options for the team's future.